Climate change is the secret of the victory of the new Australian government.. Coal subsidies bring down "Morrison" - Energy

[adinserter block=”2″]

Read in this article

  • Klimt 200 Initiative supports veteran independents supporting climate issues with $12 million
  • Half of the “seasoned independents” are women
  • Climate advocates from various initiatives were the reason for the victory of the Labor Party
  • Despite the victory of Anthony Albanese, some describe his program to reduce emissions as weak
  • Australia’s new prime minister will not come into conflict with environmental polluters
  • Albanese climate plan based on energy efficiency and carbon offsetting in agriculture

Climate change has been key to Australia’s new Labor-led government, which analysts expect will have the lowest parliamentary majority since Labor’s first victory in 1949, but will its president, Anthony Albanese – who won because young voters and women angered the policies of his predecessor, Scott Morrison? Supporting the coal industry – to be at the good faith of those who voted for him?

A question posed by Bloomberg Agency, which indicated that political victory may be easier than post-winning tasks, especially in the field of climate change, especially – also – that victory is not overwhelming.

Although the Hunter region’s Labor Party, the world’s largest coal exporter, did not win in 2019 due to Morrison’s Conservative Party advocacy for the industry, the new prime minister pledged, on Sunday, May 22, to re-launch his country’s relations with the world and change its reputation as A laggard in the fight against climate change, and his emphasis on a future era in which Australia will be more equitable, green and free of confrontational politics, the Albanese climate change program has been described as unambitious.

critical file

On Saturday, May 21, Australia announced the victory of the Labor Party led by Anthony Albanese, in the elections and the formation of the government.

As contestants tried to win over voters worried about the rising cost of living, climate change was a critical issue in this first federal ballot since the start of the coronavirus pandemic.

Voters ousted Prime Minister Scott Morrison in the election, the results of which reflected their rejection of his failure to take measures to combat climate change, France 24 reported.

Morrison also supported the coal industry, as Australia was the second largest exporter of this fossil fuel, and the largest producer of it in the world.

However, many analysts believe that Australia’s new prime minister’s plan on climate change is not strong enough, and that the differences between it and the previous government are limited.

energy mix

Climate change
Solar and wind power plants in Australia – Image via “Tara”

Australia’s new government plans to increase the share of renewable energy in the national mix to 82% from Morrison’s 68% by 2030, and will also introduce modest incentives for electric vehicles.

These percentages mean that carbon emissions in the new government’s plan will remain the largest in the world, equivalent to 351 million metric tons, and the per capita share of it more than doubles in France, Italy and Spain, in addition to the United Kingdom, and exceeds the per capita share in Russia.

And Australia’s new prime minister isn’t planning to follow in the footsteps of his predecessors, Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard, by clashing heavily with polluters.

Rudd’s first action on climate change, after his landslide election victory in 2007, was to ratify the Kyoto Document, offering the first national apology to Aboriginal Australians for Stolen Generations.

However, Rudd – the long-standing and popular – resigned from his position in 2010, after the sudden postponement of the carbon-reduction project that was rejected by the Senate.

mining tax

Climate change
Former Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard – Photo courtesy of the BBC

Julia Gillard, the first woman to hold this position in Australia, began her career as Rudd’s successor by pledging to end the debate over a mining tax that threatens $20 billion in investments.

“It is clear that my priority is that we deal with the issue of the mining tax,” she said at a press conference.

International miners such as BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto said in response that a massive proposed 40% tax would hurt the economy that depends on the industry.

Australia’s new prime minister has little he can do on the issue of climate change, as there is no carbon pricing plan, and his reduction in carbon emissions will depend mainly on energy efficiency, agricultural sector compensation, in addition to the expected increase in renewable energy projects.

Emission stability

It is expected that the levels of fossil fuel emissions from Australian gas, coal plants and oil fields will stabilize over the next decade, and Canberra will remain the largest source of this type of emissions, after Russia, because addressing this issue is difficult and fraught with risks facing any government, due to the dependence of the economy mainly on exports and mining tax revenue.

However, Canberra will also have to address carbon emissions, in light of the world’s tendency to achieve carbon neutrality and climate accountability, it focuses in particular on Australia’s emissions, and whether they remain within its borders, or export them, and in any case it does not matter where they are emissions, because they both have the same impact on climate change.

Renew Economics writer Giles Parkinson has a slightly different view of the analysts who believe the new government will do nothing for the climate change issue, that the mere victory of Labor due to increased support for independents and Greens, who are pushing for Taking strong action on climate change will mark a watershed moment in Australia’s green energy transition, as it is likely to attract huge investment to the green energy sector.

Klimt Initiative 200

Climate change
Photos of 3 ‘seasoned freelance’ candidates in Australia – Image via local ABC

In 2019, the Klimt 200 Campaign was founded to support independent candidates in the elections and advocates for the cause of climate change, environmental protection, integrity and gender equality, and was a primary supporter of Labor’s victory.

The Green Party, which has the third largest political weight in Australia, also boosted the chances of winning the new government and overthrowing Morrison’s coalition, according to the initiative and party websites, which were seen by the Specialized Energy Platform.

The Klimt 200 Campaign has supported so-called “veteran independents,” candidates vying for secure liberal seats on the basis of a larger climate action program and implementation by a Federal Integrity Commission, with $12 million it raised from more than 11,000 donors, according to “A BBC local.

Half of the veteran independents’ members are women who focus on gender issues, anti-corruption, and climate issues, according to Bloomberg.

the most divided

Veteran Independents have upset the ranks of Scott Morrison’s Conservative-led coalition in Australia, in an election that Financial Review political writer Philip Corrie has described as the most divided in Australian history.

Those elections, in which climate change played a pivotal role, as well as the cost of living, brought Labor to lead Australia’s government for the fourth time since World War II in the 1940s, and nine years later for a Morrison government, according to Currie.

Related topics.

Read also..

Subscribe to the newsletter to receive the most important energy news.

[adinserter block=”1″]
#Climate #change #secret #victory #Australian #government #Coal #subsidies #bring #Morrison #Energy


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.